Tag Archives: article
26
Jan

In praise of: The 1972 Munich Olympics

The Munich Olympic games in 1972 will always be remembered for the shocking events that took place on September 5th when eleven Israeli athletes and coaches were took hostage by paramilitaries from the Black September terrorist group and later died during an attempted ambush to free them. Events like these are always bound to live long in the memory but another abiding facet of the games is its identity which, along with Bauhaus’ work between the two great wars, was a high watermark of German – and even European – design. The branding each of the Olympic Games is a weighty enough subject in itself and, whilst the World Cup catches the hearts and minds of the world in away that the Olympics doesn’t, the commission for the Olympics is always going to be the pinnacle for any agency lucky enough to win one. The winning agency is not only tasked with delivering a workable logo and visual style for a global sporting event but also representing the personality and aspirations of a nation, and usually its capital, at a specific point in time.  Major sporting events like the Olympics and World Cups are often also sold, primarily to the people who pay the taxes that foot the bill for these events, on their regenerative potential but in the case of the Munich Games they were also required to reinforce the image of Germany as a vibrant economic power, and one free of the poisonous ideology which marred their previous games, Berlin 1936.

The choice of lead designer for the Games wasn’t a difficult choice, in Otl Aicher West Germany had one of the most prominent graphic designers of the 20th Century. Aicher was not only a founder of the Ulm School of Design and the designer of the Lufthansa Airlines brand but also the man responsible for advancing the use of ‘Pictograms’ like his famous Male and Female toilet signs and his work designing for Munich Airport, as an added feather in his cap he was also persecuted under the Nazis having been arrested in 1937 for refusing to join the Hitler Youth. With credentials like this it came as absolutely no surprise that Aicher was the man Munich turned to in order to brand the games and he didn’t disappoint in bringing his distinctive style to the games whilst managing to capture the mood of a resurgent post war Germany now happy to lead, impress and embrace the world rather than invade it.

The Logo

Perhaps the most striking thing about the Munich Olympics is its logo and, when you think about it, that’s exactly how it should be. To call the logo timeless would be an understatement, it not only combines the fractal, trippy psychedelic style prevalent at the time but also calls in heritage from the modernism, futurism and vorticism, not to forget the aforementioned Bauhaus. Whilst it remained very German in character, the logo – taking in these dynamic artistic styles from all around Europe – also had an overtly internationalist feel. Maybe I’m applying a little too much retrospective portent to it here but I’ve also always felt that the logo hinted at the turbulent state of flux that West Germany was in at the time. The Berlin Wall was just under ten years old when the identity was produced and, the hostage crisis aside, there was also the small matters of the countercultural revolution and the Baader Meinhoff Group bearing heavily on the West German psyche.

The Typography

Given the weight already attached to the games the psychology of the font choice was doubly important. The font chosen for the games was Univers, a neo-grotesque sans-serif typeface closely related to the wildly more popular Helvetica font, created by the Swiss typographer Adrian Frutiger. It was this Swissness that made the choice a significant one, the work from the Swiss design movement that Univers was part of virtually oozes modern optimism and, perhaps most importantly, neutrality. Univers is also incredibly readable and versatile in its application and has seemingly found its home in general usage on mass transit systems, appearing not only on the signage of Paris’ famously stylish Metro but also the Montreal’s Metro and San Francisco’s B.A.R.T. Maybe it’s the old romantic in me liking it as I do but it also appears, in its Bold Condensed incarnation, on the City of Westminster street signage where I spent a very significant part of my life both living and working.

Pictograms & Mascot

Perhaps the most characteristically Aicher thing that Otl Aicher brought to his identity for Munich 1972 were his pictograms. Pictograms were first used in the 1936 Berlin Olympics to help internationalise the experience of attending and simplify signage and they had become standard after the Tokyo 1964 Games, it was therefore of added importance that the 1972 pictograms were especially well designed and they were. But Aicher didn’t stop at perfect pictograms, he also created Waldi who was the first – and many people still think the best – Olympic mascot. Waldi was a simplified version of a long haired Dachshund, a very German breed of dog and one entirely less threatening than the Doberman Pinscher, for instance.  Waldi’s colouring was perhaps the only overtly political statement of the whole identity and even this was done in a thoroughly charming way. Waldi was coloured in international blue in head and tale but in the middle he was coloured according to the Olympic flag but with black and red – the colours of the Nazi Party – removed.

Stadium

Something that wasn’t within Aicher’s control but still played a massive part in the overall visual impact of the games was the Olympistadion which, with its bulging, asymmetrical, organic stained glass latticework and half submerged construction, took the futurism of the Munich Games to spectacular heights. I first encountered the stadium as an impromptu spectator at a Bayern Munich match in the mid-90s and was bowled over with it then. It still looked fresh then, twenty years after construction, and I spent most of the (admittedly dull) match with my neck craned upwards trying to work out what twisted and brilliant mind had originally imagined this, not to mention why this wasn’t adopted as the way forward for other stadia around the world. The Olympiastadion remained in use up until the 2006 World Cup in the now reunified Germany and remains an influential, if not often replicated, design. The new Olympiastadion, now less romantically called the Allianz Arena is probably its closest stylistic descendant.

Examples

Probably the best way to sign off from this post is to just leave you with some examples of the identity in application. There are many, many more examples to buy or just browse here but be sure to have a long leisurely click through some of these fantastic pieces which don’t just take in the Games themselves but also the timetables, attendant cultural festivals and some surprisingly un-kitsch merchandise.
[nggallery id=2]
Images courtesy of, and with thanks to, www.1972municholympics.co.uk where you can buy some of this lovely stuff

Continue Reading →
15
Jan

Ladies and Gentlemen I give you the single biggest threat to the Social Web

bringdownie6Chances are that, if you know anybody involved in web development, design or usability, you will already be aware of this but I’m still amazed by how many aren’t. The biggest threat that the Social Web faces today isn’t authoritarian governments, lack of broadband availability or even piracy or hackers. This pervasive threat actually comes from the company that, more likely than not and in one way or another, you are reading this blog courtesy of.

That’s right, the single biggest threat faced today by the Social Web is – dun, dun, duunnnnnnnn – Internet Explorer 6. This isn’t a hatchet job and I’m not a hater of Micro$oft by any means which, given the fact that I own a machine running Windows Vista, surprises even me sometimes. Even Microsoft themselves would suggest you download the later versions of IE and they made the thing! So, it’s probably best then, that I explain what I mean when I say it’s the Osama Bin Laden of browsers. IE6 was first shipped in August 2001, yes that’s before most of us even knew who Bin Laden was, which by anyone’s reckoning is nearly a full eight and a half years ago. Now, I am not a neophile, my car is older than that and – I’ll be honest with you here – so are some of my clothes but just imagine how long a time that is in the world of the internet.

2001Back in 2001 you could almost name your price for any business with a domain name attached to it, almost nobody used google, we were all allowed to download anything we wanted from Napster for free and without fear of legal recourse from our ISPs and the closest thing to the Social Web were sites like FARK, Slashdot and technology like ICQ and MSN Messenger. It’s safe to say that nowdays the web is a very, very different place. So why, even now when the web has moved on immesurably, do roughly 20% of users still browse the web using IE6? I guess the short answer would be the good old fashioned combination of laziness/ignorance. It’s actually different in some Third World countries where web usage is more likely to be via mobile web where it’s actually factory shipped but lets skip over that, it’s fairly safe to say that you aren’t very likely to be reading this from Thailand. So, in an effort to spread the word, here’s why you should upgrade post-post-post-haste if you are using IE6.

Aesthetics:

Aesthetically IE6 is awful, without getting too technical, it’s not really designed to interpret web pages made in the last few years. You know all of those lovely drop shadows, rounded corners, shaded edges and layers? No? Well you must be using IE6. It doesnt even support CSS2! Good designers will factor in workarounds for sites to look passable in IE6 but even the best will sometimes spend hours cursing it, going grey and grinding their teeth. They shouldn’t be doing this though, it’s a waste of everyone’s time that they have to, good designers should be doing better designs and not enslaving theirselves to a technology that, if it were on TV would be in black and white.

Functionality:

i_trash_ie6_tshirt-p235178687636954278q6iv_210An interesting thing has begun to happen around the web, if you use IE6 then some sites will actually implore you to switch or upgrade your browser. Others on the other hand just plain wont work. Twitter, for instance, began doing so around the middle of last year and I virtually jumped out of my chair when they did. Youtube followed suit not long after, and much more brutally too. This isn’t sniffy high mindedness on their part though, it’s for a perfectly valid reason. A lot of the applications that now drive the Social Web actually struggle to work with IE6. Again, without getting too technical, and to use the simplest analogy to hand, it’s like running a car on unleaded petrol when it doesn’t have a catalytic converter. Sure it might work but you’ll be in for a bumpy ride and you’ll more than likely break down pretty quickly. What’s more, you’ll get where you are going terribly slowly.

Security:

If the last two didn’t get you switching then this one will. “As of January 10, 2009, security advisory site Secunia reports 142 vulnerabilities in Internet Explorer 6, 22 of which are unpatched”. Tossing aside the likely hood that, if you are still using IE6, you will more than likely have not updated your security patches for it, that is still 22 security flaws in your browser. 22 Separate ways which nasties can still infiltrate your personal data and do beastly things to all your lovely data. I just hope you don’t bank with it.

So there you have it, switch if you can. If you are in a company using ie6, which my last company were up until last year, picket the IT department, send them this link. If you know someone who uses it shun them like a leper. It’s for the good of the Social Web remember, the less time spent on catering on nearly decade old technology the quicker progress will be.

Bin IE666 people, you know it makes sense.

Continue Reading →
11
Jan

Is press a busted flush in the internet age?

Have we seen the point where traditional printed media’s business model is just no longer sustainable?

ExpressStrike460The press industry is having a bit of a hard time at the moment, and don’t we know it. On a national level several of the biggest UK newspapers – titles like the Daily Mail, The Guardian and The Express – are rumoured to be looking at making serious cuts to editorial staff, with journalists and the humble but vital subbers being the ones getting it in the neck more often than not. The issue has reached such a pique that it’s even been debated on the floor of the House of Commons with the then Minister for Culture Media and Sport, Andy Burnham, offering the luke warm comfort that “Lord Carter is considering how to sustain quality news provision across all media at a local level as part of the final “Digital Britain” report”. Which was received about as enthusiastically as a hybrid car on Top Gear.

On a regional level in the UK the *ahem* news is, if anything, less positive. With staff being made redundant from major regional titles in Glasgow, Manchester, Leeds, Birmingham and countless other cities across the UK. The real casualty of the year though, is the London regional press. Competing freesheets The London Paper and  London Lite both hit the buffers over the past year and a bit with only the doughty, stoic Metro remaining. Even the once preeminent evening paper of London, the Evening Standard, having seemingly fought off competition from its free rivals, is itself set to become a freesheet.

It’s safe to say then, that 2009 was very much a bad year to be in newspapers and it’s pretty much the same world wide. Why is this though? Are journalists effectively being laid off because they cant do their jobs or are too expensive all of a sudden? Of course not, journalists the world over are getting the boot because the industry they work for is no longer viable, the business model is broken. The, often very talented, intelligent and savvy people are finding their selves out of a job because consumer habits have turned away from a model which has worked, on one level or another, for a good couple of hundred years.

Take a look at the ad above, you’ve probably seen it before and might even have found it funny. It was originally dreamed up for The Sun’s 40th anniversary celebrations and meant for a viral only campaign. Eventually the campaign went big though so they decided to give it a TV Run. The strange thing about it though is that it, and it’s funnier follow up, both illustrate quite how obsolete the medium of the newspaper is. It looks anachronistic, quaint even, when set against the uber-modern template of the iPhone ads, even with a tongue in cheek approach.

I’m not going to lay out all of the reasons why I, and for that matter all the reasons others, think that traditional media like newspapers are failing. The threats to their markets are everywhere from podcasts, better mobile 3g coverage, changes in the habits in which people consume their media and even the humble internet. You can debate these all you want but Newscorp, owner of everything from Fox and Sky to The Sun and The Times place the blame firmly at the feet of the internet as their main threat. In typical old media fashion Rupert’s gang have fired the first shot across the bows of Google by blocking their search bots from The Times’ site. You could say that Rupe is still smarting from the somewhat less than resounding success that was Newscorp’s acquisition of the old and busted myspace for a whopping $580 back in 2005.

In my mind the myspace disaster is probably a great test case in the difficult relationship between old and new media. Newscorp’s shiny new myspace got beaten beaten by the upstart Facebook, now ironically worth many, many times what myspace was sold for, and from that point Newscorp essentially took their ball home. Game over.

So where is the solution in all of this? Rather oddly I believe it’s The Guardian who have got the right ideas to cope with the future of publishing. I say rather oddly because if you were paying attention I mentioned them at the start of this post as being one of the ones with the threat of redundancy over their staff, in fact they also owned MEN Media who made many journalists redundant in 2009 and, to top it all off, their parent company, Guardian Media Group, lost £90m last year. Strange choice you might say then. Well yes and no.

mps_expenses_foi_harmanThe Guardian create – for my money at least – far and away the best online content of any organisation bar the BBC. This content isn’t just well regarded by those in the UK, I constantly get friends from India, Malaysia, Canada, The US and even Serbia linking to me to Guardian stories. Their podcasts are also fantastic and some of their video reporting would more than stand up to that of half of the UK’s terrestrial channels. It’s not just good journalism though, it’s innovative journalism. When the story of the MP’s Expenses Scandal broke The Guardian did something very, very clever and published all the leaked documentation onto the internet and asked their readership to scrutinise the very people they elected. As we all know, there’s nothing like a bit of local interest to spike someone’s attention and it soon began to yield it’s fair share of stories, Duck Islands, Moat Cleaning, Hob-Nobs and all. This simply wouldn’t have been possible without ‘citizen journalism’. What’s more they’ve also just launched an iPhone app which will, I promise you, blow your mind with just how great it is.

So in short, the coming decade’s successful media organisation will have to constantly reinvent it’s model. It will need to sometimes absorb a loss and it will definitely have to engage and enthuse its readers to make them part of the story. As a model press on its own is very probably a busted flush however, using the internet well – and by that I mean wringing every drop of value possible from it – must surely be the only way forward if there is any hope for survival for some of the oldest and most respected newpaper titles in the world.

Continue Reading →
22
Jun

Lee Bryant kicks off Reboot Britain with considerable aplomb

leebryantNESTA (the National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts) are a pretty interesting organisation, they are a sort of Royal Society of the Arts for the digital age cum tech-think-tank, they work across all sectors promoting innovation. It’s a partnership body which, as I can identify from with in my time at Yorkshire Culture, isnt necessarily the easiest place in the world to be so kudos to them for being such a great bunch.  Their new initiative, Reboot Britain, is designed to examine the role that digital technology – and all the varied forms it takes – can be better utilised by the Public Sector, the state, the man (or whatever you want to call it) to engage more people in more effective democracy. This, anyone but the biggest fool would have to admit, is a pretty worthy initiative.

To launch Reboot Britain NESTA are publishing 10 viewpoints compiled by a series of distinguished contributors and edited by the economist and writer, Diane Coyle. First to kick this thought piece decathalon off was Lee Bryant, co-founder of Headshift and all round very tall person, with a very well reasoned and thought through article here.

The article lays out some pretty classy ideas around how government can better spend it’s money advocating greater openess by sharing all data (bar the obvious commercially confidential stuff), conducting more policy in an open, iterative way and investing in smaller companies on an investment basis rather than going down the old ‘top four consultant reccomends massive IT contractor’ route which usually succeeds in creating nothing but content for Private Eye.

Working, as I have for the last five years, in the Public Sector and being of the bent that I am I find it hard to disagree with much of what he says. It’s pretty obvious that, just as in the constitutional government, changes are sorely needed to the way we work. The irony of it all is that – right now – there is little that anyone in the Public Sector can do about it. It may sound as if I am being apologetic for the sector’s failings and I’d like to be clear that I am not, the basic fact of the matter is that I have to work at home to post to a website, if I want to manipulate an image I cant at work, hell even if I want to research some potential Social Media application I am blocked from doing so. Either through a firewall that interprets the word “Social” as something akin to “Porn” or by a system so antquated it still runs IE6 (with no plug ins).

This would be the first baby step on the road to change, Lee’s article proposes some pretty radical things but they really need to happen.

Continue Reading →