<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Totaal &#187; PR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.totaal.co.uk/tag/pr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.totaal.co.uk</link>
	<description>Digital Communications Enablers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:41:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook: Snow White or Big Bad Wolf?</title>
		<link>http://www.totaal.co.uk/2010/06/16/facebook-snow-white-or-big-bad-wolf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.totaal.co.uk/2010/06/16/facebook-snow-white-or-big-bad-wolf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben McKenna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[targeting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totaal.co.uk/?p=952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Posted in <a href="http://www.totaal.co.uk/category/advertising-2/" title="Advertising">Advertising</a><a href="http://www.totaal.co.uk/category/blog-2/" title="Blog">Blog</a><a href="http://www.totaal.co.uk/category/technology/" title="Technology">Technology</a></p>Facebook continues to be big news – and let’s face it, when is it not nowadays? – but the world’s biggest social network seems to be attracting more and more press of the wrong type in recent times. Since last year’s change to the privacy terms and conditions, a move which in itself attracted enough [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Facebook continues to be big news – and let’s face it, when is it not nowadays? – but the world’s biggest social network seems to be attracting more and more press of the wrong type in recent times. </strong></p>
<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-946 alignright" title="boycottfacebook" src="http://totaal.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/boycottfacebook-300x152.jpg" alt="boycottfacebook" width="300" height="152" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Since last year’s change to the privacy terms and conditions, a move which in itself attracted enough bad press to sink a government with a decent sized majority, Facebook has endured what some might say was a difficult adolescence. Their difficult teenage years started to intensify even more recently with movements springing up to boycott Facebook by deleting accounts from the service. Anybody who has tried to do this recently will know just how complex and painful a task doing this actually is. There are several layers to get through before you even get the chance to deactivate your account and it takes an even greater effort to actually get them to remove you from the system itself.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The central hub of the objection that the Boycott Facebook campaigners seem to have to the site is that the information they hold about you is being misused to the point of abuse by the service. Whilst I really can sympathise with them on this it does have to be stated that these people are displaying a quite stunning level of naivety in their outrage over the issue.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I’ve been in and around the web for a long time and, whilst I’m loathe to get into the clichéd terms of “The Free Web”, “Web 1.0”, “Web 2.0” etc., it’s pretty clear that the days of the web as a force for good and a haven of free speech/content was over long before we all rushed like crazed sheep to start poking each other and turning our ‘friends’ into zombies and pirates.  Facebook, like most of the web’s most successful social brands, started out without any kind of business model or viral strategy. Like any business that starts without a goal, as soon as the product started gaining any traction so did the need to “monetize” (I know, I know. Sorry) it. You can’t expect them to provide the service for free can you?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Facebook has one primary asset that it can use as a saleable product. That asset is you, the demographic data assigned to each user account. Advertisers identify the people most likely to buy their product, they then identify the best vehicles to do that with. For instance and in the most traditional sense, if Boots are looking to promote their sale they are likely to, say, buy some ad space in the commercial break on Desperate Housewives. Likewise, if Carlsberg want to sell their Lager they will run ads in the break of the World Cup. It’s called targeting and companies will pay a certain premium to reach their target market. Facebook holds an infinitely more precise set of demographic information about you than just which TV program you are likely to be watching, everything from your age, your sexuality, what type of area you live in and what products you assign your brand loyalties to.  To believe that the information Facebook holds about you, especially given the value of that information, will not be used as some sort of saleable asset marks you out as either terribly naive or some sort of anachronistic idealist. There is a transaction that takes place for you signing up to their “free” service. For some that might not be explicit enough but to believe that it isn’t implicit is just bananas.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">That Facebook use your (or their, if you really think about it) data doesn’t make them an evil corporation bent on world domination, what it does make them is a company with a revenue stream. Maybe in a Web 2.0 world that isn’t seen as cool or bleeding edge enough to some but it is a necessity. So, they are neither Snow White or the Big Bad Wolf, as with most things the truth is a far more nuanced grey area. Expect Twitter to be next up in the race to “monetize the user base”, it’s already started with their ad-Tweets, and what’s more I’ll wager they wont make half as good a job of it as Facebook has.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.totaal.co.uk/2010/06/16/facebook-snow-white-or-big-bad-wolf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So you&#8217;re thinking of having a Social Media Newsroom?</title>
		<link>http://www.totaal.co.uk/2009/08/07/so-youre-thinking-of-having-a-social-media-newsroom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.totaal.co.uk/2009/08/07/so-youre-thinking-of-having-a-social-media-newsroom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben McKenna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culturechange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[targeting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totaal.co.uk/?p=385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Posted in <a href="http://www.totaal.co.uk/category/blog-2/" title="Blog">Blog</a><a href="http://www.totaal.co.uk/category/pr/" title="PR">PR</a></p>There’s no doubt that nowadays Public Relations is getting exponentially harder, Social Media has opened up a new front in the world of PR and people are now joining the industry with a whole different skill set to those who have traditionally been drawn to the dark arts of mass relationship and media management. Personally [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s no doubt that nowadays Public Relations is getting exponentially  harder, Social Media has opened up a new front in the world of PR and people are  now joining the industry with a whole different skill set to those who have  traditionally been drawn to the dark arts of mass relationship and media  management. Personally I think this is a good thing (well I would wouldnt I?),  bad PR and bad PR Proffessionals have had it far too easy for far too long. Much  like its stablemate advertising, PR is all about aspiration. In this case it’s  about the client’s aspiration for the reputation of their company or brand.  It  is undoubtedly one of those games where clients can often be intimidated by a  wise talking, sharp suited and well groomed individual that they have paid  handsomely to entrust with the reputation of the company who ultimately put food  on the table of their families. That intimidation can lead to a reluctance to  challenge the results of a campaign.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-388" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 20px;" title="fry_absolutepower" src="http://totaal.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/fry_absolutepower1.jpg" alt="fry_absolutepower" width="180" height="258" />I have been involved in campaigns – and heard stories of ones – where the  Corporate Communications or the PR Consultant blame their clients for the  failings of the campaign, the standard excuses generally tend to be around  people “going off brief” or legacy issues like “irredeemably damaged” brands.  These issues should have been tackled, and strategies made for mitigating the  issues, when the response to the initial brief was being developed. If they  weren’t identified or tackled at that point then you both really are – to use a  tired old cliche – preparing to fail by failing to prepare.These excuses were  easy to trot out once upon a time but they are thankfully now becoming harder to  make. The advent of Social Media has made it harder to trot out these standard  get out clause lines now most campaigns have more of a social focus and the hub  of any Social Media PR campaign is the Social Media Newsroom. As we’re  constantly being told now, Social Media is moving the  goalposts of how  campaigns now work and a good Social Media Newsroom will provide you with a map  and compass as well as a yardstick for your campaigns.</p>
<p>So what exactly is a Social Media Newsroom? Well, the newsroom is a bringing  together of several elements that already (should) exist disparately into one  place on a corporate website. SM newsrooms do an important job of representing  the breadth of a modern corporate presence, they bring together the old style  Media Room (Press Releases, or in this case Social Media News Releases, contact  details for key Press &amp; PR contacts) with multimedia content like viral  videos, pod/vodcasts and slideshare or prezi presentations. They also provide  crucial Social Media service signposting information for corporate and  professional <a title="Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/benmckenna" target="_blank">Twitter</a>, <a title="Friendfeed" href="http://friendfeed.com/benmckenna" target="_blank">Friendfeed</a>, <a title="Digg" href="http://digg.com/users/benmckenna" target="_blank">Digg</a>, <a title="delicious" href="http://delicious.com/benmckenna" target="_blank">Delicious</a> services.</p>
<p>Rather than just ‘frontending’ everything your company does though, the  Social Media Newsroom should act as the springboard for your measurement of a  story, item of content or campaign. Everything in your SN Newsroom should be  monitored as much as practically possible. The content you are putting out there  needs to be tracked and monitored for responses. You need to know where each  item is going, what it is doing and what people are saying about it and there  are great services available in today’s marketplace which allow you to see the  reach of your content and gauge the respponses to it. If items receive negative  feedback then that needs to be tackled, blogs panning your product need to be  replied to and – if the feedback is serious enough to warrant it and budget  allows it – changes to that content need to be made.</p>
<p>So what do they actually do? In contrast to old school Press Office/Media  Centre areas of sites Social Media Newsrooms provide a more immersive and  immediate experience for Press and PR contacts looking for information on a  company, project or individual. They also allow a more iterative, longer lasting  relationship with these key contacts – who are effectively key markets for  corporate Press and PR staff -allowing a more personal, fertile relationship to  start both on and off line. That said, SN Newsrooms don’t just serve a specific,  media focussed niche but also work perfectly for the Social Media literate  customer/client allowing them to sign up and receive information much in the  same way as a journalist would.</p>
<p>The Social Media literate customer can be just as important as the journalist  – in some cases more so – as they will be very likely to share news, content or  new product information with their peers via reTweets, blog posts or Social  Bookmarking Services thus boosting the Word of Mouth Marketing credentials of  the company. It’s therefore very important to manage this relationship, these  people will in all likelihood be promoting your company brand far beyond what  can be achieved with normal press relationships. If you treat these people  right, as we’ve seen with Apple, they can be the best evangelists for your  product or service money (or rather no money, save your investment in a Social  Media Newsroom) can buy. By the same token though, these “envangelists”can be  the biggest threat to your brand image so, rather than treat them just like you  would a journalist, they require their own strategy for cultivation. Keep them  happy, keep them fed and above all keep them engaged. Listen to them, reply to  them when they query you and above all make them feel special.</p>
<p>Resources:</p>
<p><a title="GM Europe SMNR" href="http://www.gmeurope.info/social_media_newsroom/" target="_blank">GM Europe’s  Social Media Newsroom</a>:</p>
<p>Pretty much a case study in how a Social Media Newsroom should be, this  nicely laid out SMNR agregates feeds, shows tags, signposts useful GM blogs and  even feeds recent comments.</p>
<p><a title="Shift Comms SMNR" href="http://www.shiftcomm.com/newsroom/" target="_blank">SHIFT Communications Social Media Newsroom</a>:</p>
<p>Probably the grandaddy of them all when it comes to Social Media PR, SHIFT  pretty much pioneered the idea of the SMNR. I was lucky enough to see a  presentation by these guys a couple of years back and I’ve been amazed by how  influential their thinking has been as I’ve been hearing it parroted back to me  ever since.</p>
<p><a title="First Direct SMNR" href="http://www.newsroom.firstdirect.com/" target="_blank">First Direct Social Media Newsroom</a>:</p>
<p>Banks generally get a lot of bad press and they dont help theirselves in  perpeuating the stuffy image, apart from First Direct the only person who is  trying to counter this image is Cristophe Langolis, former Social Evangelist at  Lloyds TSB and author of the <a title="Visible Banking" href="http://www.clanglois.blogs.com/internet_banking/" target="_blank">Visible  Banking</a> blog. First Direct are pretty much leading the vanguard action in  changing this and can lay claim to the title of the UK’s only Social Bank.</p>
<p><a title="Fathom SEO SMNR" href="http://www.fathomseo.com/pressroom/" target="_blank">Fathom SEO Social Media Newsroom</a>:</p>
<p>Fathom are an ethical SEO and internet marketing company and they live the  ethics right through to their Social Media News Room. They are so ‘right on’ in  terms of being open and social they even provide you with a free WordPress theme  for you to have your own SMNR. Beautiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.totaal.co.uk/2009/08/07/so-youre-thinking-of-having-a-social-media-newsroom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

